offoffoff film



Site links
  • Contact us

    Get our newsletter:
    Search the site:

    Film section
  • Film main page
  • Film archive
  • Audio index
  • Film links

    Top 10 lists

  • Top 10 films of 2004
    (Andrea, David, Joshua, Leslie)
  • Top 10 films of 2003
    (Andrea, David, Joshua, Leslie)
  • Top 10 films of 2002
  • Top 10 films of 2001
  • Top 10 films of 2000
  • Top 10 films of 1999
  •  All of our top 10 lists, 1999 - 2004

    Current movies

  • Afterschool
  • Antichrist
  • Babies
  • Broken Embraces
  • Dare
  • District 9
  • The End of Poverty?
  • Fix
  • Food Beware
  • The Men Who Stare at Goats
  • Pirate Radio
  • Precious
  • Red Cliff
  • The September Issue


  • Brooklyn International Film Festival
  • Human Rights Watch Film Festival
  • New York Film Festival


    Complete archive

    Recent reviews:
  • (500) Days of Summer
  • Anita O'Day: The Life of a Jazz Singer
  • The Art of the Steal
  • The Beetle
  • Blessed is the Match: The Life and Death of Hannah Senesh
  • Boy A
  • Brideshead Revisited
  • The Brothers Bloom
  • Burn After Reading
  • Cold Souls
  • The Duchess
  • Elegy
  • Enlighten Up! A Skeptic's Journey Into the World of Yoga
  • Five Minutes of Heaven
  • Flame and Citron
  • Frozen River
  • Happy-Go-Lucky
  • How to Lose Friends & Alienate People
  • The Human Condition
  • Hunger
  • Inglourious Basterds
  • King of Shadows
  • The Lemon Tree
  • Lorna's Silence
  • A Man Named Pearl
  • Man on Wire
  • Memorial Day
  • Mister Foe
  • Morning Light
  • My FĆ¼hrer
  • My One and Only
  • Paris
  • The Pervert's Guide to Cinema
  • Peter and Vandy
  • Police, Adjective
  • Pray the Devil Back to Hell
  • Profit Motive and the Whispering Wind
  • Rachel Getting Married
  • A Secret
  • Sleep Dealer
  • St. Trinian's
  • Thirst
  • Throw Down Your Heart
  • Valentino: The Last Emperor
  • What's the Matter with Kansas?
  • Wild Grass
  • Jay DiPietro


    The Trilogy

    Camera angles

    "The Trilogy," three films that look at the same characters and events from three different perspectives, rewards those with the patience to see all three although the films aren't necessarily worth seeing by themselves.


    They aren't sequels and they aren't prequels. The three films that make up Lucas Belvaux's "The Trilogy" require us to invent a whole new term: simulquels?

    Written and directed by: Lucas Belvaux.
    Includes individual films: "Cavale" (On the Run); "Apr¸s la vie" (After Life); "Un couple ˇpatant" (An Amazing Couple)
    Cast: Catherine Frot, Dominique Blanc, Patrick Descamps, Olivier Darimont, Jean-Henri Roger, Elie Belvaux, Hervˇ Livet, Eric Vassard, Zirek, Thomas Badek, Alexis Tomassian, Yves Claessens, Christine Henkart, Ornella Muti, Fran¨ois Morel, Valˇrie Mairesse, Bernard Mazzinghi, Gilbert Melki, Lucas Belvaux, Rapha‘le Godin, Patrick Depeyrrat, Pierre Gˇrard, Jean-Baptiste Montagut, Vincent Colombe, Anne Delol.
    Cinematography: Pierre Milon.
    In French with English subtitles.

    Related links: Official site
    Angelika Film Center 18 West Houston at Mercer St. "On the Run" opens Jan. 30, 2004 "After Life" opens Feb. 6, 2004 "An Amazing Couple" opens Feb. 13, 2004

    These three films happen during the same period of time to the same cast of characters, and include many of the same events, but seen from three different perspectives and reformulated in three different genres. It's a clever ploy, and yet the result is something quite strange. To get the desired effect, you have to see all three films, none of which is much worth seeing by itself.

    You can see the films any which way, but they will open on sequential Fridays in New York in this order: First up is "On the Run," a thriller about a political radical who escapes from prison to continue the revolution. Second is "An Amazing Couple," a comedy-romance about a troubled couple who were background characters in the first film. Third is "After Life," a loosely constructed cop film in which a detective investigates a strangely acting character from the second film without realizing how close he is to catching the bad guy from the first film. ("After Life" is best saved for last.)

    The Trilogy  
    Seeing all three films gives you numerous moments of mind-stretching recognition. Some scenes in parts two and three cast related scenes from parts one and two in a completely different light. Other times, we know things the characters don't know because we've already seen what they're missing. Those are the psychic rewards for watching all three installments.

    Yet, to see any one film by itself, you may be disappointed by loose construction and inadequate explanation of what's going on. The significance of characters and scenes from one part is often totally unclear until you've seen another; conflicts set up in part one aren't resolved until part three, and maybe not even then. So getting something worthwhile out of "The Trilogy" requires a serious three-part commitment, one whose rewards are not necessarily worth the effort involved.

    JANUARY 30, 2004

    Reader comments on The Trilogy:

  • Rewarding   from debbie, Dec 19, 2005

  • Post a comment on "The Trilogy"