offoffoff film
 RELATED PROJECTS

      







 ADVERTISEMENT













Site links
  • OFFOFFOFF Home
  • About OFFOFFOFF
  • Contact us

    Get our newsletter:
     
    Search the site:
     

    Film section
  • Film main page
  • Film archive
  • Audio index
  • Film links


    Top 10 lists


  • Top 10 films of 2004
    (Andrea, David, Joshua, Leslie)
  • Top 10 films of 2003
    (Andrea, David, Joshua, Leslie)
  • Top 10 films of 2002
  • Top 10 films of 2001
  • Top 10 films of 2000
  • Top 10 films of 1999
  •  All of our top 10 lists, 1999 - 2004

    Current movies


  • Afterschool
  • Antichrist
  • Babies
  • Broken Embraces
  • Dare
  • District 9
  • The End of Poverty?
  • Fix
  • Food Beware
  • The Men Who Stare at Goats
  • Pirate Radio
  • Precious
  • Red Cliff
  • The September Issue

    Festivals


  • Brooklyn International Film Festival
  • Human Rights Watch Film Festival
  • New York Film Festival

    Archive


    Complete archive

    Recent reviews:
  • (500) Days of Summer
  • Anita O'Day: The Life of a Jazz Singer
  • The Art of the Steal
  • The Beetle
  • Blessed is the Match: The Life and Death of Hannah Senesh
  • Boy A
  • Brideshead Revisited
  • The Brothers Bloom
  • Burn After Reading
  • Cold Souls
  • The Duchess
  • Elegy
  • Enlighten Up! A Skeptic's Journey Into the World of Yoga
  • Five Minutes of Heaven
  • Flame and Citron
  • Frozen River
  • Happy-Go-Lucky
  • How to Lose Friends & Alienate People
  • The Human Condition
  • Hunger
  • Inglourious Basterds
  • King of Shadows
  • The Lemon Tree
  • Lorna's Silence
  • A Man Named Pearl
  • Man on Wire
  • Memorial Day
  • Mister Foe
  • Morning Light
  • My F├╝hrer
  • My One and Only
  • Paris
  • The Pervert's Guide to Cinema
  • Peter and Vandy
  • Police, Adjective
  • Pray the Devil Back to Hell
  • Profit Motive and the Whispering Wind
  • Rachel Getting Married
  • A Secret
  • Sleep Dealer
  • St. Trinian's
  • Thirst
  • Throw Down Your Heart
  • Valentino: The Last Emperor
  • What's the Matter with Kansas?
  • Wild Grass
  • Jay DiPietro

  •  READER COMMENTS

    Reader comments on Anatomy of Hell

    Subject: Re: Hell is Good
    Date: May 20, 2005
    Sender: patrickPrevious | Next

    hey considering the fact that it is a film based mostly on the suibject of sex whether its good or bad depends on the understanding of the people who percieve what should be the ground for morality or expression for love. i for one would appreciate the director for the bold portrayal of the film on such a tabboo subject

    Previous: Hell is Good | Next: u no what i be sayin dawg

    Respond to this message | Return to original article: Anatomy of Hell



    Response to this comment:
    Hell is Good

    Okay, while I totally agree that this film is over the top, and not the best of B.'s films by far, and not even I know what she was going forhere, for the most part, this film is still more interesting than almost any film featuring "romantic" and "sexual" realtionships you will ever see, and that is what makes Breillat an interesting and singular director.

    In this film, I think she fails at making her point, but not at trying to make her point: that sexuality, men, women, they way we relate, the mysteries of life, childhood, the psyche, the adult soul, all of these things swirl together and make people crazy, and often, the only glimpse we get at the dark orgies of energies that troll in the mind, occur when we try to fuck someone else. Then all hell breaks loose, and we try to dominate and control others, buy love and affection, try to make up for childhood needs with sexual affection, kill people, and all kinds of things. Sex is revelatory and DEEP, not just about fun and connection. Breillat tries to expose that. Not everyone is ready for that.

    The way sex and love is depicted in almost all films is either on the totally romantic, light, or dramatic levels, or, in the case of porn, on the totally graphic, physical level. Only Breillat tries to show how sex really works in the soul--as yet another expression of the strange mysteries of life, and the deep destructive and creative energies of people that they rarely understand, examine, or take seriously--until they start fucking somebody. This stuff is so subjective, and so mysterious, that some people never talk or think about it. That Breillat does so stiffly in this film is a valid criticism, but what is more interesting is that fact that she tries to examine these truths at all.

    But what makes a man a man, and a woman a woman, and what compels us to be together, and create and maintain life, and develop as people and societies... these are very deep energies all connected to the raw energies of sex, and THIS, this reality is what Catherine Breillat is trying to depict in all her films.

    I don't really fault her with making a bad movie. I really applaud her for trying to explore more specifically the female soul as it relates to man, and all the swirl and depth of sex as it relates to the swirl and depth of the life of the individual. To me, this is more reality than any tight or brilliant "romantic comedy," or "sexual thriller."

    If you can watch this movie, and ask "why?," ask why, a lot, and seriously, it may get you thinking about sex, and life, and yes MYSOGYNY. Again, I don't think Breillat did a great job, but the fact that she tried to tackle this question, the thousands-year-old tradition of mysogyny in the history of mankind, when supposedly men love and desire women so much sexually at the same time, is incredibly interesting and daring.

    The author of this article thinks that's silly. But Breillat raises more than a decent question, and a very complex one, that is a very deep pin in the eye of all sexual relations, even gay ones. Men say they love us, yet women are habitually treated like shit, at the very best like second class citizens in first world countries, who must struggle harder for rights, wealth, and recognition. If that's a silly question, I think that shows that mysogyny is alive and well in the mind of this writer, who cannot acknowledge the validity of "female" questions, or the brilliance of a director dedicated to tackling them.






    Comment index:

  • Hell is Good   from Alexis, Nov 25, 2004
  • » Re: Hell is Good «   from patrick, May 20, 2005
  • u no what i be sayin dawg   from DaQuizzer, Mar 13, 2005
  • comment   from mike de leon, Feb 9, 2007
  • movie   from James, Jun 19, 2007
  • some problem   from Omary. kawaya, May 10, 2008
  • the movie   from haider, Mar 20, 2011
  • Hell is Good   from Alexis, Nov 25, 2004
  • » Re: Hell is Good «   from patrick, May 20, 2005
  • u no what i be sayin dawg   from DaQuizzer, Mar 13, 2005
  • comment   from mike de leon, Feb 9, 2007
  • movie   from James, Jun 19, 2007
  • some problem   from Omary. kawaya, May 10, 2008
  • the movie   from haider, Mar 20, 2011