|
Reader comments on
Subject: Re: mulholland drive-this and previous "give
Date: Aug 4, 2003
Another testament to the pretentious stupidity of critics and the dullness of the general population is the lauding of this complete and utter piece of trash. Lynch made a truly great, ground-breaking film in "Blue Velvet" but has been either too lazy or content to come up with a new idea ever since. "Mulholland Drive" is a laughably inane piece of dreck. To read anything into this movie vis a vis "Meaning", is an insult to anyone's intelligence.
Previous: Re: mulholland drive-this and previous "give | Next: Re: mulholland drive-this and previous
Respond to this message |
Return to original article:
|
Response to this comment:
Re: mulholland drive-this and previous "give
Steven is very correct. I think he missed the truth about the "demon" however. IMO, the "demon" was Rita, burned alive, who came back to "Betty/what was her name" after accident, causing her to suicide. The second half of the movie is chronologically real and the first half is the "blameless" construct of Betty's dead soul...as Steven said, the "what could have been" imagining.
|
Comment index:
» Re: mulholland drive-this and previous "give « from Rick, Aug 4, 2003
wow from Rosanna, Jun 10, 2002
Re: wow from Joshua (editor of Offoffoff), Jun 12, 2002
Re: wow from Tashtigo707, Jun 17, 2002
PCP from Kilgore Trout, Sep 1, 2002
Aunt??? from HugeElvis, Oct 14, 2002
» Re: mulholland drive-this and previous "give « from Rick, Aug 4, 2003
wow from Rosanna, Jun 10, 2002
Re: wow from Joshua (editor of Offoffoff), Jun 12, 2002
Re: wow from Tashtigo707, Jun 17, 2002
PCP from Kilgore Trout, Sep 1, 2002
Aunt??? from HugeElvis, Oct 14, 2002
|
|
|
