|
Reader comments on
Subject: Childish Review
Date: Jul 8, 2002
I give little credence to a reviewer who doesn't pay enough attention to the film to know the difference between two weeks and one week. Our reviewer also feels five short paragraphs constitutes a movie review. If he didn't understand the film he must have not been paying enough attention or is lacks the skills of analysis to notice the subtle psychological affects of the movie. If he wants a movie that doesn't "resort to cliches" and "has brains" why doesn't he inform all of us how the filmmakers could have done that or even explain how they didn't. I'm not saying Session 9 is the best movie ever, I just think it deserves more credit than Mr. Tanzer has given to it. He makes allusions to problems in the film without giving any examples or even explaining what he means. This review is the equivalent of typing SESSION 9 SUCKS!!! in bold face type.
Previous: Re: Session 9: A True To Form Horror Movie | Next: re: misunderstood
Respond to this message |
Return to original article:
|
Comment index:
» Childish Review « from Nikku, Jul 8, 2002
GONE from CrapBall, Sep 1, 2006
Flaws from Chefboyartie, Jun 24, 2008
» Childish Review « from Nikku, Jul 8, 2002
GONE from CrapBall, Sep 1, 2006
Flaws from Chefboyartie, Jun 24, 2008
|
|
|
